Skip to content

Conversation

@MarcosNicolau
Copy link
Member

@MarcosNicolau MarcosNicolau commented Apr 28, 2025

Description

Add the aggregator type (SP1, Risc0) to the aggregation mode views. To achieve this, we:

  1. Get the tx hash from the log
  2. Fetch the transaction detail
  3. Decode the input and the function signature

New look

Screenshot 2025-04-29 at 11 01 33 AM

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • New feature

Checklist

  • “Hotfix” to testnet, everything else to staging
  • Linked to Github Issue
  • This change depends on code or research by an external entity
    • Acknowledgements were updated to give credit
  • Unit tests added
  • This change requires new documentation.
    • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • This change is an Optimization
    • Benchmarks added/run
  • Has a known issue
  • If your PR changes the Operator compatibility (Ex: Upgrade prover versions)
    • This PR adds compatibility for operator for both versions and do not change batcher/docs/examples
    • This PR updates batcher and docs/examples to the newer version. This requires the operator are already updated to be compatible

@MarcosNicolau MarcosNicolau marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2025 14:02
@MarcosNicolau MarcosNicolau self-assigned this Apr 29, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@JuArce JuArce left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a comment about naming


<div>
<h3>
Aggregator:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd change "Aggregator" for "Proving System"

@MauroToscano MauroToscano added this pull request to the merge queue May 6, 2025
Merged via the queue into staging with commit c4b5f75 May 6, 2025
1 check passed
@MauroToscano MauroToscano deleted the feat/explorer-show-verifier-on-aggregation-mode branch May 6, 2025 19:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants